I linked to the techno-centric description from the US government a few days ago, and both Yigal Chamish and Shawn Callahan rightly complained in the comments that it missed whole aspects of KM that are important to the field. Here is some thought on the way I think about KM.
The August 2006 TOC Update from Goldratt Marketing Group includes an item on The Impact of Multitasking by Mike Mannion and Sven Ehrke.
Patrick Lambe has self-published a piece he calls "Money, Testosterone and Knowledge Management" which discusses a schism in KMPro in 2004.
A member of a mailing list pointed us to the US Government's definition of knowledge management. Even though the definition is fairly technology-centric, I generally agree with it.
More fun for Friday. Soy Latte? I guess these quizzes don't always get it right.
Anecdote is using an interesting methodology, called Most Significant Change, that uses storytelling to help measure the normally-implicit value of projects and change initiatives. They are enhancing the MSC process with some tools.
Luke Naismith writes about "Infoluenza." This idea goes beyond strict information overload and suggests a group psychology that prevents us, as a society, from stopping and thinking about what we are doing and why.
Dennis Kennedy points to the Innovation Styles website and a personality test for your Innovation Style.